SolidWorks has no free version and offers a tiered subscription payment model for its licensing options, including standard, professional, and premium. In contrast, SolidWorks’ assembly-driven method is highly useful when you need to document each part’s model.

This is an effective method for large scale projects where individual parts will be used in multiple assemblies.įusion 360’s part modelling method also allows team members to cross-reference parts in an assembly and build off them. This means each assembly part in SolidWorks has a different file, which are then assembled in a separate file. It’s an efficient modelling method for small scale assembly projects because designers don’t have to sort through multiple files when building an assembly.Ĭomparatively, SolidWorks is primarily an assembly-driven software that offers an optional multi-component system. This allows individual assembly components to be built and assembled in a single file. 1.Part Modellingįusion 360 is the newer software of the pair, and it offers an updated part modelling process where it uses a multi-component part system. This article discusses the top 7 differences between Fusion 360 and SolidWorks. This similarity pitches professionals and users on either side, claiming one of the two is better than the other. They’re closely related software packages that do the same thing at their core. It has since remained a popular software option in the engineering, design, and manufacturing industry.Īs more developers and software companies recognized the importance of 3D modelling, new software options such as Autodesk’s Fusion 360 were introduced.īoth Fusion 360 and SolidWorks are used by similar professionals, including architects, civil engineers, animators, designers, and manufacturers. SolidWorks was created by Dassault Systèmes, and it was the first fully commercialized 3D CAD modelling software. The Fusion 360 vs SolidWorks battle is a common thought.

Fusion 360 alternative